 |
International Journal of Computer & Organization Trends (IJCOT) |  |
| © 2024 by IJCOT Journal | ||
| Volume - 14 Issue - 2 | ||
| Year of Publication : 2024 | ||
| Authors : Btissam CHINKHIR, Safae EL GAZI, Ahmed IBRAHIMI | ||
| DOI : 10.14445/22492593/IJCOT-V14I2P301 |
How to Cite?
"Better Taming Distance in Online Training; Technological Innovation" International Journal of Computer and Organization Trends vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 1-9, 2024. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.14445/22492593/IJCOT-V14I2P301
Abstract
The fragmentation of Internet technologies in various areas of life disorients the two spatio-temporal landmarks so much perceived from the fixed parameters. However, the experience of time and space now lived with the emergence of new sociability proves that human relations are formed outside the absolute character of metric distance while freeing themselves from synchronous temporality. Digital progress in distance learning refers to the erasure of distance in favor of proximity. Technological tools have defied the variable of time while they have succeeded in bringing together physically and geographically distant actants. From this nail, the article will briefly visit some of the consequences that have the emblematic questioning of distance to distances and that have laid the first foundations on the constraint of presence, which is often talked about as a factor contributing to the motivation and commitment of learners in a distance learning course. In the same conceptual dimension, the work will also focus on some pedagogical practices that are imbued with the contribution of the social sciences to rethink distance pedagogy better. Undeniably, the technological boom has made the feeling of presence possible through interactive managerial practices such as collaborative work, the creation of a Learning or Practice Community and hybridization. In addition to the different distances, the present work will begin with a simple mapping of distances, since it is a question of distances, then make a brief outline of the concepts, proximity and presence, often in cohabitation with the term of distance. The second part will be dedicated to some research with the ambition of demonstrating the interest of building a remote presence and to what extent it is closely linked to the socio-emotional involvement of learners. What are these distances to be tamed? What terminology arises in the context of distance Learning? To what extent does the new technology contribute to establishing a remote social presence?
Keywords
Distance(s), Social presence, Proximity, Tools and Strategies, Taming absence.
References
[1] Annie Jézégou, “Training Distance First Milestone for an Operationalization of the Theory of Transactional Distance,” Distances and Knowledge, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 342-366, 2007.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[2] Annie Jézégou, “Presence in E-Learning: Theoretical Model and Perspectives for Research,” International Journal of E-Learning and Distance Education, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 1-15, 2012.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[3] Annie Jezegou, “Distance, Proximity and Presence in e-Training,” Treatise on e-Learning for adults. Brussels: De Boeck, pp. 1-32, 2019.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[4] B. Blandin, “Open and Distance Learning: State of Play at the Start of 1999,” Continuing Education News, no. 160, pp. 18-28, 1999.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[5] Bruno De Lievre, Bernadette Charlier, and Nathalie Deschryver, “Hybrid Devices in Higher Education: Theoretical, Methodological and Practical Questions,” Education and Training, pp. 1-161, 2014.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[6] Deschryver et al., Education & Training Review e-301: Hybrid Systems in Higher Education: Theoretical, Methodological and Practical Issues, pp. 1-161, 2014.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[7] J.F. Bourdet, The Training of Teachers and Future Language Teachers in a System, 2010.
[8] Cédric Fluckiger, “On the Emergence of New Forms of Distance,” Distances and Knowledge, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 397-417, 2011.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[9] Cathia Papi et al., “Interaction in Distance Learning: Between Theories and Practices,” TransFormations, no. 17, pp. 1-25, 2017.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[10] D. Paquelin. (2011). Distance: A Question of Proximity in Guillemet P.; File E.; BarnaJ.; Vidal M. Distances and knowledge, where does the distance go? Volume 2, vol.9, no. 4, 565-589. Retrieved from Distances and Knowledge, Where Does the Distance Go? Volume 2, vol.9, no. 4.
[11] Daniel Celebrate, “Mediation and Mediatization: The Virtual Campus,” Hermès, The Review, vol. 3, no. 25, pp. 153-167, 1999.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[12] D. Peraya. (2011). A look at "distance", seen from "presence". Retrieved from P.Guillemet; E.Fichez ; J.Barna; M.Vidal dir. Distances and knowledge, Where does distance go? Volume 1, Vol. 9, No. 3: http://www.cairn.info/revue-distances-et-savoirs.htm
[13] Daniel Peraya, “Distances, Absence, Proximotation and Presences: Concepts on The Move,” Distances and mediations of knowledge, vol. 2, no. 8, 2014.
[CrossRef] [Publisher Link]
[14] Éric Brunelle, “Managing Remotely Vs. Managing Distance: How to Reduce Psychological Distances?” Retravail, [Online]. Available: https://retravail.com/ressources-humaines/gestion-distance-psychologique/
[15] E.M.Esch, “Exploring the Concept of Distance for Language Learning,” Recall, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 5-11, 1995.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[16] Edgar Morin, The Method. 1. The Nature of Nature, Ecology and Social Sciences, pp. 1-326, 1977.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[17] Edgar Morin, The Method Volume 3; Knowledge of Knowledge, Edition du Seuil, Coll. Points, Paris, 1986.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[18] Edward T. Hall, The Hidden Dimension, Paris, 1966. [Online]. Available: https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/906339.The_Hidden_Dimension
[19] Wenger Etienne, and Gervais Fernand, The Theory of Communities of Practice, Learning, Meaning and Identity, Laval University Press, pp. 1-332, 2005.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[20] Wenger Etienne, and Gervais Fernand, The Theory of Communities of Practice, Learning, Meaning and Identity, Laval University Press, pp. 1-332, 2005.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[21] F. Henri, and A. Kaye, “Knowledge at Home: Pedagogy and the Problem of Distance Learning,” Journal of Distance Education, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 87-89, 1987.
[22] Geneviève Jacquinot, “Tame the Distance and Eliminate the Absence? Or The Challenges of Distance Learning,” French journal of pedagogy, vol. 102, no. 1, pp. 55-67, 1993. [Online]. Available: https://www.persee.fr/doc/rfp_0556-7807_1993_num_102_1_1305
[23] G. Gavelle, and E. de Pembroke, “Distance University Training: What Distances are these?,” Studies in Applied Linguistics, vol. 113, pp. 105-112, 1999.
[24] John Dewey, Logic- The Theory of Inquiry, Paris, 2006.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[25] Jean Houssaye, The Pedagogical Triangle, Bern: Peter Lang, 1988.
[CrossRef] [Publisher Link]
[26] Kurt Lewin, “Action research and minority problems,” Journal of Social Issues, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 34-46, 1946.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[27] Catherine Kiyitsioglou-Vlachou, and Evangelia Moussouri, “Sociolinguistic and Didactic Approach to the “Distance” Factor in the Training of FLE Teachers,” Distances and Knowledge, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 475-488, 2010.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[28] Linard, M. (2006). Learner autonomy and ICT. Proceedings of the conference Communication tools and human presence. Poitiers.
[29] Thomas W. Malone, and Mark R. Lepper, “Making learning fun: A taxonomy of intrinsic motivations for learning,” Dans R.E.Snow, & M. (dir.), Aptitude, learning, and instruction Vol. III – Conative and affective process analyses- (pp. 223-253). Hillsdale [NJ]: Lawrence Erlbaum. 1987.
[30] Michael Grahame Moore, Theory of Transactional Distance, Taylor and Francis, New York, 3rd ed., pp. 22-38, 1993.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[31] Gustave Nicolas Fischer, and Fischer, Fundamental Concepts of Social Psychology, Dunod, 2015.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[32] Philippe Dessus, “What is Teaching? Some Necessary and Sufficient Conditions of this Activity,” French Journal of Pedagogy, no. 164, pp. 139-158, 2008.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[33] Philipe Dessus et al., “A Personal Learning Environment Assessing Epistemic and Dialogical Distances,” Distances and Knowledge, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 473-492, 2011.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[34] P.Guillemet, E.Fichez, J.Barna, & M.Vidal, (2011). Where Does the Distance Go? Volume 1, vol. 9, n. 3, Retrieved from Distances and knowledge: http//www.cairn.info/revue-distances-e-savoirs.htm
[35] Didier Paquelin, “Distance: Questions of Proximity,” Distances and Knowledge, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 565-590, 2011.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[36] B. D. PONTS, “Teaching in Person, Teaching at A Distance, What Are the Differences?” 2020. [Online]. Available: https://pedagotheque.enpc.fr/2020/04/20/enseigner-en-presence-enseigner-a-distance-quelles-differences/#:~:text=La%20distance%20renforce%20le%20r%C3%B4le,et%20%C3%A0%20distance%20est%20diff%C3%A9rent.
[37] D. Randy Garrison, E-Learning in the 21st Century, A Framework for Research and Practice, London, 1st ed., 2003.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[38] D. Randy Garrison, Terry Anderson and Walter Archer, “The First Decade Of The Community Of Inquiry Framework : A Retrospective,” The Internet and Higher Education, vol. 13, pp. 5-9, 2010.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[39] Thierry Karsenti, “How the Use of ICT in University Pedagogy Can Promote Student Motivation: The Case of a Mediated Course on The Web,” Education research papers, vol. 4, no. 3, 1997.
[CrossRef] [Publisher Link]
[40] Viviane Glickman, From Correspondence Courses to E-Learning, French Review of Pedagogy, pp. 126-128, 2003.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]