Scope for business and tenure of Employment in the digital environment

International Journal of Computer & Organization Trends  (IJCOT)          
© 2019 by IJCOT Journal
Volume - 9 Issue - 4
Year of Publication : 2019
Authors :  Dr. K.R.Subramanian
DOI : 10.14445/22492593/IJCOT-V9I4P308


MLA Style:Dr. K.R.Subramanian"Scope for business and tenure of Employment in the digital environment" International Journal of Computer and Organization Trends 9.4 (2019): 54-60.

APA Style:Dr. K.R.Subramanian(2019).Scope for business and tenure of Employment in the digital environment International Journal of Computer and Organization Trends, 9(4),54-60.


Current business environment is characterised by rapid changes on the one hand and the complexity of keeping a continuity of employment. In the past we have heard of life time employment in one company for new entrants to any business organization. But today it seems hardly possible for any body to continue till retirement as an employee in the organization he/she joins to make a career. The business environment as we know continually changes due to emergence of new technologies and new ways of doing business. Mobile technologies and the smart phones have revolutionalised the ways of doing business, apart from the growing competition. Digital technologies have made possible accessibility to a variety of information by the tap of a finger. IT has become an integral part of any business or rather it is the driver of modern business. A prospective employee has to be sensitive to digital technologies and has to keep continuously updating his/her knowledge and Technologies for achieving business success. An Employer has also needs to adopt new Technologies and generation of employees to suit his demanding needs. This article would attempt to trace the genesis and consequences of this change in the outlook.


[1] Thibodaux, N. & Rouse, R. (2005). Retaining key knowledge in the utility industry: How the `funnel theory" bridged the retirement gap. KM Review, 8(4), 16-19…..Carter, C. (2004, July-August). When your Gurus walk out the door. KM Review, 7(3), 16-19.
[2] Ashworth, M.J. (2006). Preserving knowledge legacies: workforce aging, turnover and human resource issues in the US electric power industry. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 17(9), 1659-1688
[3] "How to Build an Effective and Organized Business Continuity Plan". Forbes. June 26, 2015.
[4] Elliot, D.; Swartz, E.; Herbane, B. (1999) Just waiting for the next big bang: business continuity planning in the UK finance sector. Journal of Applied Management Studies, Vol. 8, No, pp. 43–60. Here: p. 48.
[5] Alan Berman (March 9, 2015). "Constructing a Successful Business Continuity Plan". Business Insurance Magazine.
[6] Ian McCarthy; Mark Collard; Michael Johnson. "Adaptive organizational resilience: an evolutionary perspective". Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability. 28: 33–40.
[7] Yossi Sheffi (October 2005). The Resilient Enterprise: Overcoming Vulnerability for Competitive Enterprise. MIT Press.
[8] Tiffany Braun; Benjamin Martz (2007). "Business Continuity Preparedness and the Mindfulness State of Mind". Semantic ?An estimated 80 percent of companies without a well-conceived and tested business continuity plan, go out of business within two years of a major disaster? (Santangelo 2004)
[9] "Building A Resilient Nation: Enhancing Security, Ensuring a Strong Economy report"(PDF). Reform Institute. October 2008.
[10] "Business Continuity Plan". United States Department of Homeland Security. Retrieved 4 October 2018.
[11] "BIA Instructions, BUSINESS CONTINUITY MANAGEMENT - WORKSHOP" (PDF), Disaster Recovery Information Exchange (DRIE) Central. Retrieved 4 October 2018.
[12] Ellis Holman (March 13, 2012). "A Business Continuity Solution Selection Methodology" (PDF). IBM Corp.
[13] British Standards Institution (2014). Societal security – Business continuity management Systems – Requirements: London
[14] Anderson C. R., Hellriegel D., Slocum J. 1977. Managerial response to environmentally induced stress. Academy of Management Journal, 20: 260–272
[15] Ashford S. J. 1988. Individual strategies for coping with stress during organizational transitions. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 24: 19–36
[16] Brockner J. 1988. The effects of work layoff on survivors: Research, theory, and practice. In Staw B. M.Cummings L. L. (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior, vol. 10: 213–256. Greenwich, Conn.: JAI Press.
[17] Buchanan B. 1974. Building organizational commitment: The socialization of managers in work organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 19: 533–546.
[18] Gutchess J. F. 1985. Employment security and productivity? It can be done. National Productivity Review, 4: 275–286.
[19] Jacobson D. 1988. A personological study of the job insecurity experience. Social Behavior: in press.
[20] Mowday R. T., Steers R. M., Porter L. W. 1979. The measurement of organizational commitment. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 14: 224–247.
[21] Romzek B. S. 1985. The effects of public service recognition, job security and staff reductions on organizational involvement. Public Administration Review, 45: 282–292.
[22] Rosow J. M., Zager R. 1985. The case for employment security. Across the Board, 22: 34–41. Google Scholar.
[23] Rotter J. B. 1960. Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychological Measurement, 80: 1–27. Google Scholar.
[24] Smith F. J., Kerr W. A. 1953. Turnover factors as assessed by the exit interview. Journal of Applied Psychology, 37: 352–355. Google Scholar.
[25] Smith P. C., Kendall L. M., Hulin C. K. 1969. The measurement of satisfaction in work and retirement. Chicago: Rand McNally and Co. Google Scholar.
[26] Steers R. 1977. Antecedents and outcomes of organizational commitment. Administrative Science Quarterly, 22: 46–56. Google Scholar.
[27] Walsh J. P., Ashford S. J., Hill T. E. 1985. Feedback obstruction: The influence of the information environment on employee turnover intentions. Human Relations, 38: 23–46.Google Scholar.

[1] storm-clouds 1.1322137?firstfree=yes
[4] Bureau of Labor Statistics, U.S. Department of Labor.

Continuity of employment in a particular company, environmental and technological influences and perceptions, digital technolgies and outlook of companies and employees, genesis and consequences of such changes in outlook.