Software Process Improvements in Small Scale Company
Citation
M.Suganya, Dr. K. Alagarsamy "Software Process Improvements in Small Scale Company", International Journal of Computer & organization Trends (IJCOT), V7(4):18-26 Jul - Aug 2017, ISSN:2249-2593, www.ijcotjournal.org. Published by Seventh Sense Research Group.
Abstract The software business knows the importance of very small enterprises in funding valued goods and services to the economy. As the quality of software increasingly becomes a subject of concern and procedure methods are growing and gaining the confidence of companies. Software process developments are essential to develop the framework and quality of software companies to reach their business purposes. It is a systematic method to increase the capabilities and work performance of software organizations. Established software quality is critical to confirm steadfast goods and services and to increase employee confidence and satisfaction. Single basic idea is to measure the organizations current activity and increase their software process on the foundation of the capabilities and knowledges of the practitioners working in the organization. Thus, in this paper we have defined and explained the software process improvement model which consists of the six basic phases. The new idea is finding in parallel phaseand we have to obtain to satisfy the employee specification and flexible working arrangements.
References
[1]. Avison, D., Baskerville, R. and Myers, M. 2001. Controlling Action Research Projects. Information Technology & People14(1): 28-45.
[2]. Carvalho, L., Scott, L., and Jeffery, R.: An exploratory study into the use of qualitative research methods in descriptive process modelling. Information and Software Technology. 47(2) (2005) 113 127.
[3]. Dybå, T. 2001. Enabling Software Process Improvement: An Investigation on the Importance of Organizational Issues. thesis. Norwegian University of Science and Technology.
[4]. Hansen, B., Rose, J. and Tjørnhøj, G. 2004. Prescription, Description, Reflection: the shape of the software process improvement field. International Journal of Information Management 24(6): 457-472.
[5]. Lyytinen, K. and Robey, D. 1999. Learning failure in information systems development Information Systems Journal 9(2): 85-101.
[6]. Westergaard Hansen, H. , K. Thaysen (1998a). NP - Assessment Process Report (in Danish).University of Aalborg, Institute for Electronic Systems, Department of Computer Science, Denmark.
[7]. Westergaard Hansen, H., K. Thaysen (1998b). Process Improvement in a Small Danish Software Company (in Danish). MSC Thesis, University of Aalborg, Institute for Electronic Systems, Department of Computer Science, Denmark.
[8]. Kautz, K., K. Thaysen (2000). Knowledge, learning and IT Support in a Small Software Company, in Proceedings of BPRC CONFERENCE on ’Knowledge Management: Concepts and Controversies’ 10-11, February, 2000: University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.
[9]. Rogers, E. M. (1983). Diffusion of Innovations (3rd edition). The Free Press, New York.
[10]. Kautz, K. (1999). Software Process Improvement in very Small Enterprises: Does it pay off? In Journal of the Software Process .Improvement and Practice, Special Issue on Organizational Change with Software Process Improvement, Vol. 5.
[11]. Borum, F. (1995). Strategies for Organizational Change (in Danish). CBS Publishing Company. Copenhagen, Denmark.
[12]. Basri, S., O’Connor, R.V.: Understanding the perception of very small software companies towards the adoption of process standards. In: A. Riel, R.V. O’Connor, S. Tichkiewitch, R. Messnarz (eds.) Systems, Software and Services Process Improvement, Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol. 99, pp. 153–164. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg (2010)
[13]. Boas, G., da Rocha, A., Pecegueiro do Amaral, M.: An approach to implement software process improvement in small and midsized organizations. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on the Quality of Information and Communications Technology, pp. 447–452. IEEE, Washington, DC, USA (2010)
[14]. Boehm, B., Turner, R.: Balancing Agility and Discipline: A Guide for the Perplexed. Addison-Wesley, Boston (2003)
[15]. Boucher, Q., Perrouin, G., Deprez, J.C., Heymans, P.: Towards configurable ISO/IEC 29110- compliant software development processes for very small entities. In: D. Winkler, R.V. O’Connor, R. Messnarz (eds.) Systems, Software and Services Process Improvement, no. 301 in Communications in Computer and Information Science, pp. 169–180. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg (2012)
[16]. Buchalcevova, A.: Software process improvement in small companies as a path to enterprise architecture. In: R. Pooley, J. Coady, C. Schneider, H. Linger, C. Barry, M. Lang (eds.) Information Systems Development, pp. 243–253. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg (2013)
[17]. Calvo-ManzanoVillal´on, J.A., Gonzalo Cuevas, A., San FeliuGilabert, T., de AmescuaSeco, A., Garc´?aS´anchez, L., Cota, M.P.: Experiences in the application of software process improvement in SME’s. Software Quality Journal 10(3), 261–273 (2002)
[18]. Cater-Steel, A.: Process improvement in four small software companies. In: Proceedings of the Australian Software Engineering Conference, pp. 262–272. IEEE, Washington, DC, USA (2001)
[19]. Cater-Steel, A.: Lowrigour, rapid software process assessments for small software development firms. In: Proceedings of the Australian Software Engineering Conference, pp. 368– 377. IEEE, Washington, DC, USA (2004)
[20]. Cater-Steel, A., Toleman, M., Rout, T.: Process improvement for small firms: An evaluation of the RAPID assessment-based method. Information and Software Technology 48(5), 323– 334 (2006)
[21]. Cater-Steel, A.P.: COTS developers lead best practice adoption. In: Proceedings of the Conference on Software Engineering, pp. 23–30. Los Alamitos, CA (2000)
[22]. Chaves Weber, K., Ramalho de Araujo, E., Scaler, D., Pereira de Andrade, E., Cavalcanti da Rocha, A., Montoni, M.: MPS model-based software acquisition process improvement in brazil. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on the Quality of Information and Communications Technology, pp. 110–122. IEEE, Washington, DC, USA (2007)
[23]. Cholez, H., Girard, F.: Maturity assessment and process improvement for information security management in small and medium enterprises. Journal of Software: Evolution and Process 26(5), 496–503 (2013)
[24]. Clarke, P., O’Connor, R.V.: The influence of SPI on business success in software SMEs: An empirical study. Journal of Systems and Software 85(10), 2356–2367 (2012)
[25]. Clarke, P., O’Connor, R.V.: The situational factors that affect the software development process: Towards a comprehensive reference framework. Information and Software Technology 54(5), 433–447 (2012)
[26]. Clarke, P., O’Connor, R.V.: An empirical examination of the extent of software process improvement in software SMEs. Journal of Software: Evolution and Process 25(9), 981–998 (2013)
[27]. Coleman, G., O’Connor, R.: Investigating software process in practice: A grounded theory perspective. Journal of Systems and Software 81(5), 772–784 (2008)
[28]. Cruz, P., Villarroel, R., Mancilla, F., Visconti, M.: A software testing process for the reference model of compete soft. In: Proceedings of the International Conference of the Chilean Computer Science Society, pp. 51–59. IEEE, Washington, DC, USA (2010)
[29]. Davila, A., Basurto, C., Flores, L., Arisaca, R., Manrique, R., S´anchez, J., de Paula Pessˆoa, M.: The peruvian component of Competesoft project: Lesson learned from academic perspective. In: Proceedings of the Conference Latinoamericana InInformatics, pp. 1–7. IEEE, Washington, DC, USA (2012)
[30]. European Commission: The new SME definition. Enterprise and industry publications.Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg (2005).
Keywords
Software Process Improvement, Process, small corporation quality and SPISC phase.